-
Be informed of the variety of family systems
theories.
-
Be able to formulate problem/symptoms from a
systems perspective.
-
Be informed of the feminist perspective and how
it contributes to your understanding of family systems.
-
Be informed of the variety of clinical practices
used by the family therapist.
-
Understand that the interventions in family therapy
are aimed at pattern breaking rather than individual symptoms.
-
Be able to relate the material from the text
to your family of origin to increase your awareness of family systems
influences on yourself as a human service professional.
| 1. Essay Exams - 5 exams @ 50 points |
|
250 pts. |
| 2. Film Analysis “Ordinary People” |
|
50 pts. |
| 3. Family Analysis Paper |
|
50 pts. |
| 4. Research Article Critique |
|
25 pts. |
| 5. Forming a simulated family (NOT CEL) |
|
20 pts. |
| |
Total Points: |
395 pts. |
-
Film Analysis: “Ordinary People”:
This assignment requires you to view the film and address the following
points.
- family roles
- family rules
- family communication patterns
- power structure
- family secrets
- subsystems: alliances, coalitions,
- healthy family elements/dysfunctional family elements
-
Family Analysis: You may elect to analyze
your own family or another family with which you have close experience.
Use the family analysis questions in the analysis. Include a genogram
of three generations. (grandparents, parents, children). Typed,
proofed, spell-checked, with cover sheet.
-
Research Article Critique; Polasky L.J.
& Holahan, Carole K. (1998). Maternal self-discrepancies, inter-role
conflict and negative affect among married professional women with
children. Journal of Family Psychology, 12,3, 388-401. Briefly summarize
the article and include your reactions to the research and findings.
| Topic |
Reading |
| |
| Adopting a family frame of reference |
Ch. 1 Goldenberg |
| |
| Film: “Ordinary People” |
|
| |
| Family development: continuity and change |
Ch. 2 Goldenberg |
| |
| Form simulated family NOT CEL |
|
| |
| Gender/Culture/Ethnicity |
Ch. 3 Goldenberg |
| |
| Exam 1 September 29, 2003 |
|
| |
| Family as a Psychosocial System |
Ch. 4 Goldenberg |
| |
| Develop family’s roles/history/problems NOT CEL |
|
| |
| Film Analysis due October 6, 2003 |
|
| |
| Growth of Family Therapy: 1950-Present |
Ch. 5 Goldenberg |
| |
| Theoretical perspectives: Psychodynamic |
Ch. 6 Goldenberg |
| |
| Exam 2 October 20, 2003 |
|
| |
| Experiential Models |
Ch. 7 Goldenberg |
| |
| Research Article Critique Due October 27 |
|
| |
| Transgenerational Models: Bowen |
Ch. 8 Goldenberg |
| |
| The Structural model |
Ch. 9 Goldenberg |
| |
| Exam 3 November 10, 2003 |
|
| |
| Strategic Models |
Ch. 10 Goldenberg |
| |
| Make family video-tape NOT CEL |
|
| |
| The Milan Model |
Ch. 11 Goldenberg |
| |
| Cognitive/Behavioral Models |
Ch. 12 Goldenberg |
| |
| Exam 4 December 1, 2003 |
|
| |
| Postmodernism and the Social Constructionist |
Ch. 13 Goldenberg |
| |
| Family Analysis Paper Due December 8, 2003 |
|
| |
| Family Therapy Research |
Ch. 15 Goldenberg |
| |
Final Exam:
Exam 5 Monday, December 15, 2003; 7:30-9:30 |